This is an outdated version published on 2018-08-05. Read the most recent version.

OpenDaylight vs. Floodlight: Comparative Analysis of a Load Balancing Algorithm for Software Defined Networking

Authors

  • Jonier Porras Universidad Distrital Francisco Jose de Caldas
  • Daniel Ducuara Universidad Distrital Francisco Jose de Caldas
  • Gustavo Puerto Universidad Distrital Francisco Jose de Caldas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17762/ijcnis.v10i2.3178

Abstract

This paper presents the proposal of a load balancing algorithm implemented in two of the most popular controllers for Software Defined Networks (SDN): OpenDaylight and Floodlight. A comparative study in terms of the available bandwidth and delay time of the packet forwarding was performed by means of simulation modeling in a base network in which a shortest path algorithm was implemented as well. The results show that the proposed load balancing algorithm improves significantly the performance of a SDN in terms of the offered QoS of a OpenDaylight based controller. The effect of the proposed load balancing algorithm in the Floodlight controller shows a smaller impact mainly on the bandwidth allocation due to its in-build modules that by default perform specific routing and forwarding operations efficiently according to the traffic demand.

Downloads

Published

2018-08-05

Versions

How to Cite

Porras, J., Ducuara, D., & Puerto, G. (2018). OpenDaylight vs. Floodlight: Comparative Analysis of a Load Balancing Algorithm for Software Defined Networking. International Journal of Communication Networks and Information Security (IJCNIS), 10(2). https://doi.org/10.17762/ijcnis.v10i2.3178

Issue

Section

Research Articles